PQ 2015

Hot News

Pražské Quadriennale scénogravie a divadelního prostoru Back to PQ 2015 Services homepage
PQ E-Scenography PQ Logo

Back

1967 » » Exhibition of Czechoslovak stage design and costumes

Curator:Vladimír Jindra
Authors of Theme:Vladimír Jindra

Československo

Czechoslovak scenography presented itself to the world public in a complex historical survey at the Biennial of Sao Paulo in 1959 and in a number of monographic exhibitions devoted to the work of Vlastislav Hofman, František Tröster, Josef Svoboda, Jan Sládek, Josef Gabriel, Ladislav Vychodil and many other significant artists in almost all European and non- European cultural centres. Everything that can be said of its historical development has thus already been said and we therefore feel that it would be more important to mention at least briefly the state, tendencies and problems of the contemporary work, which served as a decisive criteria in evaluating the individual works as well as drawing up the general concept of this exhibition. The overall picture of the Czechoslovak exhibit is to a certain extent distorted by the absence of three of our most outstanding artists, František Tröster, Josef Svoboda and Ladislav Vychodil who according to the Prague Quadrennial cannot as the winners of the Sao Paulo Biennial participate in this competition, and also due to the fact that the Czechoslovak exhibit as a whole has been excluded from international competition and can compete with the other national exhibits only unofficially. Due to these circumstances the exhibit is more in the nature of a review along the tendencies outlined by the I. National Review of Czechoslovak Stage Design, held in Brno in 1960. Certainly this exhibit is not one of those chosen for the Theatre Biennial in Sao Paulo which was marked by a certain topical theme with the individual exhibits acting as documents of these tendencies and not exhibits in themselves as in the case of paintings. The present exihibit dangerously resembles such exhibits of paintings and the individual items on exhibit somehow take on the aspect of paintings. These are two of the „shortcomings" of this exhibit caused by objective reasons which we found necessary to mention before going on to discuss present trends in the sphere of stage design. An analysis will determine two main trends in contemporary scenography: The first of these is based on the results of the work of our prewar avantgarde of the thirties its aim being the work with lights, motion, time and space as dramatic factors, which is being considered the constanta, the specificity which differentiates scenography from the traditional form of art, from painting, sculpture and architecture. If present-day scenography rejects the means and methodical processes of this „traditional" form of art, the reasons differ from those of the twenties of this century, when the prevailing slogan was one of „pure" art. Theory thus considered the unsurmountable limits of material means which divide the various fields of art from each other, and of the common aims which on the contrary join them together. However, for the present state of art — observing the validity of the second part of the thesis - the penetration of one field of art into another is characteristic, a fact which holds true even more so for the sphere of material means: sculpture joins painting, literature joins graphic art, the stage combines with films, etc. The contact of scenography with the other fields of art thus acquires a new characteristic independent of traditional processes while at the same time scenography in this sense has a particular task - it returns creative art impulses of a higher form which it had adopted itself and is in turn influenced by it all over again. It thus achieves something which new art cannot do: it has a more pregnant function, sense and purport as well as a new shape. The second trend of contemporary scenography strictly rejects the building up of dramatic space, which it considers an artificially constructed supershape, it rejects illusionism in any form and tries to discover the elementary essense of scenographic work, searching for the function of a bare stage and the role of props. The stage remains a stage, a theatricial architectural element necessary for the actor's acting who plays a functional role. No need to stress that this trend is essentially an analytic one and its purpose resembles the ideas on which the constructivism of the twenties was based. In the early stage of its genesis we find instances where the constructivist scheme, either in the structure of the scene, the choice of props or the arrangement is actually repeated in the formal aspect. When speaking of analysis as one of the characteristic, even elemental property of this trend we add that analysis is only the first, initial phase of its work method, which is negated immediately by the second, synthetic phase. The entire process of disintegration and the immediate new linking unfolds in front of the eyes of the spectator. It is a process of creation, of constant appearance and disappearance which is the specific trait of stage art, activising, the spectator and theatrical creativeness, resulting in the immediate contact of the actor and spectator which differentiates the stage from films and television.


Exhibiting artists / ateliers

[show all | hide all]
  • Helena Bezáková
  • Květoslav Bubeník
  • Pavel Mária Gábor (Pavol Gábor)
  • Ján Hanák
  • Milan Hložek
  • Luboš Hrůza
  • Štefan Hudák
  • Zbyněk Kolář
  • Mikuláš Kravjanský
  • Jan Kropáček
  • Vladimír Nývlt
  • Irena Nývltová
  • Čestmír Pechr
  • František Perger
  • Vladimír Půhoný
  • Ludmila Purkyňová
  • Michael Romberg
  • Zdeněk Seydl
  • Otakar Schindler
  • Bořivoj Slavík
  • Vladimír Suchánek
  • Vladimír Šrámek
  • Vojtěch Štolfa
  • Otto Šujan
  • Miloš Tomek
  • Karel Vaca
  • Stanislava Vaníčková
  • Adolf Wenig
cz / en